<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blojsom v3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
                        <title>Understanding HTML, XML and XHTML</title>
        <link>http://www.anothercaffeinatedday.com/blog/default/2006/09/21/Understanding-HTML-XML-and-XHTML.html</link>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://webkit.org/&quot; title=&quot;Surfin&amp;#39; Safari&quot;&gt;Surfin&amp;#39; Safari&lt;/a&gt;, the blog of the WebKit rendering engine, has an incredibily lucid post about what it really means to use HTML vs. XHTML and &lt;em&gt;visa versa&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you spend a lot of time coding XHTML 1.0 and 1.1 web content like I do, &lt;a href=&quot;http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68&quot; title=&quot;Understanding HTML, XML and XHTML&quot;&gt;read this post on Understanding HTML, XML and XHTML&lt;/a&gt;. You won&amp;#39;t waste your time again with trying to get XHTML 1.1 content to validate if it&amp;#39;s just not going to be right in the end.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s a lot of noise in the trackbacks, pingbacks and comments related to Dashboard widgets and developer/user impacts, but I could care less. It was the body of the argument that was more important.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
        <language>en</language>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <generator>blojsom v3.3</generator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>/</category>
        <managingEditor>caffeinated@anothercaffeinatedday.com</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>caffeinated@anothercaffeinatedday.com</webMaster>

                
            </channel>
</rss>


